The former international development secretary Priti Patel has joined calls for a radical shake-up of the aid budget rules, in a further sign that overseas funding could be a key issue in any post-Brexit Tory leadership race.
She follows the former foreign secretary Boris Johnson in making calls for broadening the definition of British overseas aid.
Patel, who resigned after she broke ministerial rules in her relations with the Israeli government, will on Monday back a pamphlet from the pressure group the TaxPayers’ Alliance calling for the international development budget to be reformed, and for the UK alone to decide what constitutes aid, rather than international organisations.
The Tory MP remains committed to the statutory target of UK aid being set at 0.7% of GDP, but calls for changes in what can constitute aid, tighter controls on UK aid spent by multilateral bodies and changes to the requirement that the target is reached in every calendar year.
While foreign policy does not normally feature in British party leadership contests, this may change in the context of the growing Tory debate about the UK’s international role post-Brexit. There have also been calls for a shake-up of Whitehall with the Foreign Office once again taking control of the aid budget, as well as trade issues.
Patel is not a declared runner for the leadership, and may back Johnson, in which case they will be competing with the former Brexit secretary Dominic Raab for Eurosceptic votes.
Jeremy Hunt, the foreign secretary and Penny Mordaunt, the international development secretary, are also seen as likely challengers if they can gather support in the parliamentary party before the election is thrown over to the party membership.
The 0.7% target, warmly embraced by David Cameron as a symbol of Tory modernisation, is not popular in the party membership, but many voices have argued that a large aid budget will be necessary to retain UK soft power and international stature.
The TaxPayers’ Alliance pamphlet that Patel endorses calls for piracy, drug busting and peacekeeping to be included in aid definitions. It proposes that funds to help poor countries take out private sector insurance against natural disasters should count towards the target. It also claims the current rules requiring the aid spending target be met within a calendar year leads to wasteful hurried spending at the end of the year.
The report also suggests that after Brexit the UK should take more control of its aid spending with less transferred to multilateral institutions such as the World Bank or the EU. As much as 40% of UK aid is currently channelled through multilateral bodies.
Tim Pilkington, chief executive of the charity World Vision, said: “An anti-aid agenda is now becoming brazen within parts of parliament. It is unacceptable for the world’s poorest to be used as a football in a Brexit-fed political power struggle.
“We cannot stand by and let a narrative take root that it is better to spend UK aid on boosting Britain rather than eradicating global poverty. Diverting funds from the world’s poorest communities under the guise of taking back control in the UK is shameful, and incompatible with a truly global Britain.”
John O’Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “Ministers need to bring the development rules in house, face down the international NGO cartels and address the real effectiveness of aid spending by signing off every penny.”
A DfID spokesman said: “The UK is shifting how it spends aid to ensure our investment benefits us all and is fully aligned with our national interest. All our work aims to reduce extreme poverty and we are continuing to push for reform to get the most out of the aid budget for the world’s poorest and UK taxpayers.
“This weekend the international development secretary announced more funding to make it easier for small British charities and humanitarian organisations to access the aid budget.”