Why eggheads really are a catch! How clever men are more fertile and have more children than others
- Research suggest men with higher IQs considered more attractive by women
- It also found clever men are more fertile and have more children than others
- And that being an intelligent man leads to status in society and more wealth
Clever men are more fertile and have more children than others, research has found.
The findings suggest that those with higher IQs are considered more attractive by women.
In addition, being intelligent leads to status in society and more wealth – extra factors as to why eggheads are considered ‘a catch’.
The research overturns previous findings – that larger families are the preserve of people who are not blessed with higher IQs.
Clever men are more fertile and have more children than others, research has found. Stock picture
University of Stockholm scientists looked at a database of IQ scores of all Swedish men born between 1951 and 1967.
The IQ tests were used for conscription to the army’s national service and covered more than 779,000 men.
They then followed up how many children each man went on to have.
The scientists writing in the Royal Society Journal Proceedings B said: ‘We find a positive relationship between intelligence scores and fertility, and this pattern is consistent across the cohorts we study.’
They added: ‘Men with the lowest categories of IQ scores have the fewest children.’
The researchers said they controlled for additional factors such as levels of education and parental background.
They said: ‘After such adjustments we find a stronger positive relationship between IQ and fertility.’
To assess the impact of family background, the researchers compared how many children brothers had.
They found that a brother with the lowest category of cognitive ability would have 0.58 fewer children compared to a brother with an IQ of 100, the average IQ level, while men with the highest category had 0.14 more children than someone of the average ability.
While it may sound comical to talk about an extra child’ or ‘14 per cent of a child’, across a whole population, this would mean thousands of extra children born to more intelligent people thousands fewer to the less intelligent.
The researchers said that earlier research on the subject had been flawed as, unlike the Swedish survey, they were not based on a whole population, but instead school classes or samples.
The authors say that possible explanations are that having a low IQ score is closely linked to poor health in childhood, which may be the reason why people with lower scores have fewer children.
They added: ‘The positive relationship between intelligence and fertility is probably explained by men with higher cognitive ability having higher status and more resources, and the fact that high cognitive ability is an attractive trait in the partner market.’
They said the trend emerging in Sweden is likely to be seen elsewhere: ‘We think that a plausible future scenario is that many societies will see the re-emergence of a positive association between high intelligence as well as other dimensions and correlates of status-and fertility.’
