Money

Vote-grabbing gimmicks put pensions at risk | Letters


We view with deep misgivings the suggestion by James Brokenshire that first-time buyers be allowed to dip into their pension funds to help them get a deposit on a home (Report, 4 June). There is considerable evidence suggesting that people save too little for their old age. Without an increase in the supply of housing, enabling young people to use their pension fund for house purchases will only result in bidding up house prices, largely benefiting existing homeowners.

The recent policy of auto-enrolment has been a success in increasing the number of people saving for a pension: it followed a long period of consultation and gained cross-party support. In contrast, off-the-cuff suggestions such as Mr Brokenshire’s risk undermining the pension system. We have been here before: George Osborne’s sudden abolition of the compulsory annuity requirement in 2014 has undermined the annuity market without providing any satisfactory replacement. As we predicted, that policy change resulted in some pensioners losing money after being mis-sold unsuitable financial products. Unless we can find ways to insulate the UK pension system from vote-grabbing gimmicks, there is a significant risk that future generations will have inadequate pensions in their old age.
David Blake Professor of finance, Cass Business School
Edmund Cannon Professor of economics, University of Bristol
Ian Tonks Professor of finance, University of Bristol

Whatever the outcome of the court case about increasing women’s state pension age (Report, 6 June), we will still be a long way from achieving gender equality in pensions. It is telling that legislation to equalise state pension age was passed as long ago as 1995, but women reaching state pension age are not projected to receive the same amount of state pension as men until the early 2040s. Prospect produced research showing that the gender pension gap is 39.5%. Despite this glaring inequality, the government does not even produce its own estimate of the gender pension gap; we need proper recognition of this problem and policies to tackle it.
Sue Ferns
Senior deputy general secretary, Prospect

Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition



READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.