Money

Serco fined for electronic tagging scandal, but still allowed to win lucrative government contracts



Serco has been fined £19.2m plus £3.7m in costs over an electronic tagging scandal that saw it charge the public for supervising the movements of people who were dead, in prison or had left the UK.

The outsourcing giant has taken responsibility for three offences of fraud and two of false accounting as part of a deferred prosecution agreement with the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).

Lisa Osofsky, the director of the SFO said Serco “engaged in a concerted effort to lie to the Ministry of Justice in order to profit unlawfully at the expense of UK taxpayers”.

Despite a string of scandals surrounding Serco, it won the largest ever UK government contract in January – a £1.9bn deal to manage 5,000 properties occupied by asylum seekers who are waiting for their claims to be processed.

On Wednesday, its UK subsidiary Serco Geografix announced an agreement with the SFO which brings to an end investigations over wrongful billing and means a full criminal prosecution is avoided. 

The firm admitted it was “mortified” by its conduct over the tagging scandal between 2010 and 2013. Serco was stripped of its responsibility for tagging criminals in late 2013 and paid £70m to the government in December of that year after it overcharged the government on the contract.

The £19.2m fine includes a 50 per cent discount because Serco reported the problems itself and co-operated with the investigation. An investigation into rival outsourcer, G4S, over electronic tagging is ongoing.

In a statement, Serco pointed out that none of the senior executives in charge between 2010 and 2013 are still at the company.

Separately, Serco was fined £6.8m by the government between April 2013, and December 2018 for failures in its provision of housing for asylum seekers.

Rupert Soames, Serco Group chief executive, said he was ‘mortified’ by the company’s behaviour (Reuters)

Rupert Soames, Serco Group chief executive, said: “Those of us who now run the business are mortified, embarrassed and angry that, in a period between six and nine years ago, Serco understated the level of profitability of its Electronic Monitoring contract in its reports to the Ministry of Justice.

“Serco apologised unreservedly at the time, and we do so again.”

He added: “The management and culture of Serco, and the transparency with which we conduct our affairs, have changed beyond all recognition, and we are pleased that this has been acknowledged by both the SFO and by the government.”

Serco said it has taken “significant steps” to reform itself, including more than 80 actions and initiatives, including rewriting its system of management control, as well as strengthening its bidding, contract management, internal audit and management assurance processes.

The group now reports annually to the SFO and the cabinet office on its assurance programme following the saga.

The Financial Reporting Council also launched an investigation in June 2016 into Serco’s group auditor, Deloitte, at the time of the offences.



READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.