Scotland’s progression to a low carbon future is being held back by national security policy from Westminster, according to new research.
The security concerns of the UK Government are prioritised when conflicts arise with Scottish energy policy, with no balanced consideration of low carbon energy transitions and national security, states analysis of 15 years of policy documents by academics at the University of Sussex Business School and the Finnish Environment Institute.
Dr Paula Kivimaa and Ms. Marja H. Sivonen highlight examples where strategic aims around a low carbon transition away from a fossil fuel dependent economy conflicted with UK security policy, such as objectives to safeguard oil platforms in its territorial waters and abroad.
The study warns that the incoherence between security and energy policies may lead to less efficient use of public spending and a slowing down of the transition to a more sustainable energy system.
The academics also raise concerns that the move towards a low-carbon energy future will create an even more complicated policy environment, where coherence between energy and security objectives will be harder to achieve because of the pressures from climate change and increasing global instability over demand for energy.
The study also warns that the security risks from moving to a low carbon energy systems, including the availability of materials needed for renewable energy systems and cyber threats to smart energy systems, may not be currently well understood or mitigated for in government policy.
Kivimaa, senior research fellow in the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at the University of Sussex Business School and research professor in the Finnish Environment Institute, said: “There is a functional overlap between energy and security policies and incoherence between the two is likely to create conflicting policies, reducing the efficiency of public spending, and potentially slowing down the energy transition.
“To reduce barriers for rapid emissions reductions, two issues need to be acknowledged and addressed: that traditional security policy may be hindering energy system change and that the energy transition is changing the security implications of energy systems.
“A good example is how Boris Johnson’s announcement to increase UK nuclear warheads is a traditional security move that may further reinforce the nuclear industry more generally instead of strengthening the Scottish transition to renewable energy, as earlier research at University of Sussex has shown a link between military and non-military nuclear.”
In a new article published in Energy Research & Social Science, the researchers analysed the degree of policy coherence and integration between low carbon energy policies and security policies in Finland, Estonia and Scotland by reviewing 72 policy strategy documents published between 2006 and 2020.
The policy document analysis reveals how UK energy policy is diverging from that of Scotland, notably through Scotland’s strong opposition of nuclear power demonstrated in objectives and measures as well as the devolved administration’s more ambitious plans related to climate change mitigation, economic development and energy efficiency.
The study noted that the integration of security and energy policy for Scotland had decreased since 2006.
Kivimaa said: “Our study indicates that most countries experience political conflicts between a shift towards zero carbon energy and national security policies, however, this may be more pronounced for Scotland given the devolution of powers between Westminster and Holyrood.
“Policymakers will need to undertake more careful and detailed assessments of how policy coherence can be advanced in an environmentally and socially sustainable way.”
Don’t miss the latest headlines with our twice-daily newsletter – sign up here for free.
