Rachel Riley wins libel battle against political blogger and Jeremy Corbyn supporter

The judge ruled in Rachel Riley’s favour (Picture: Rex)

Rachel Riley has won a libel battle against Mike Sivier, a political blogger and Jeremy Corbyn supporter, over an article which alleged she engaged in a ‘campaign of online abuse and harassment; against a teenager on Twitter.

The Countdown star, 35, sued Sivier over the article on his website Vox Political in January 2019, which had the headline: ‘Serial abuser Rachel Riley to receive “extra protection” – on grounds that she is receiving abuse.’

Sivier had argued the article was ‘substantially true’ after it was found to mean that Riley had ‘engaged upon, supported and encouraged a campaign of online abuse and harassment of a 16-year-old girl’ in Twitter exchanges that took place in December 2018 and January 2019.

The court ruled in Riley’s favour with Mrs Justice Collins Rice concluding Sivier’s defence had ;no prospect; of succeeding at a libel trial.

The allegation had centred on tweets from an online debate on anti-Semitism in the Labour Party, some of which were between Riley and a Twitter user who identified herself as a 16-year-old called Rose.

The judge ruled that Riley’s exchange with Rose was a ‘straightforward, rational and respectful exchange of views’ and that there was no evidence the presenter had encouraged any of her 600,000 followers to harass Rose, nor was she responsible for any abuse the teenager received.

The Countdown star had been involved in a Twitter exchange to do with anti-Semitism in the Labour Party (Picture: Channel 4)

Justice Rice said: ‘Rose challenged Ms Riley to engage with her and thanked her for her response.

‘Third parties appear to have made mischief in the wake of that engagement, and Rose herself publicised a narrative that she was the victim of bullying for which Ms Riley’s “gang” was to blame.

‘Mr Sivier’s website article said this was fact, and he seeks now to defend that by showing Ms Riley’s speech and “deliberate and calculated omissions” were responsible.

‘There is no arguable source for that responsibility in law or fact; and it is a still further leap to the truth of an allegation of deliberately supporting and encouraging a campaign of abuse and harassment.

‘I do not see an argument from Ms Riley’s alleged omissions realistically capable of supporting that allegation.

The judge ruled the exchange was a ‘straightforward, rational and respectful exchange of views’ (Picture: Rex)

‘For all these reasons, I have not been able to discern in Mr Sivier’s pleadings a case, arguable with a realistic prospect of success, that it is substantially true that Ms Riley engaged upon, supported and encouraged a campaign of online abuse and harassment of Rose.

‘That itself precludes the possibility of arguing that any such conduct incited others to make death threats to Rose.

‘If such threats were made there is no basis for saying they were incited by Ms Riley’s conduct as alleged, since there is no arguable basis for establishing the objective fact of that course of conduct.’

She added that Twitter was ‘a haunt of trolls’, which ‘the vulnerable enter at great personal peril,’ though that does ‘not excuse’ online harassment.

Sivier has said in a post on his website that he intends to appeal against the decision and asked his supporters to fund the legal challenge. 

Got a story? 

If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

MORE : Rachel Riley reveals cheeky plans for Nick Hewer as he quits Countdown

MORE : Rachel Riley applauds Jeremy Corbyn’s suspension from Labour Party over anti-Semitism report


READ  The internet has fun with the BBC News theme tune

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.