Science

London is the capital city of microplastic pollution, study finds


London is the global capital of microplastic pollution: Study finds highest-ever levels of the tiny airborne fragments on a British rooftop amid growing safety concerns

  • Kings College researchers studied London, Hamburg, Paris and Dongguan
  • Collected and assessed amount of microplastics falling from the atmosphere  
  • Roof of nine-story London building was the most polluted site in the study
  • True extent of health impact on people is still unknown despite ongoing research

Microplastics in the atmosphere are falling from the skies onto roofs and into human lungs in alarming quantities, scientists have found. 

Tiny pieces of plastic – measuring between 0.02mm and 0.5mm in length – were captured on top of a nine-story building in London as well as at sites in Hamburg, Paris and Dongguan. 

Eight samples were taken and measured in England’s capital city, revealing it to be the city with the most polluted atmosphere. 

Scientists are desperately trying to understand how bad the ubiquitous invisible particles are for human health. 

Scroll down for video 

Eight samples were taken and measured in England's capital city, revealing it to be the city with the most polluted atmosphere (stock)

Eight samples were taken and measured in England’s capital city, revealing it to be the city with the most polluted atmosphere (stock)

A total of 15 different microplastics were identified in the study, The Guardian reports.

Rates at which the microplastics fell from the sky varied from 575 to 1,008 pieces per square metre per day.

Stephanie Wright from Kings College London told The Guardian: ‘We found a high abundance of microplastics, much higher than what has previously been reported.

‘But any city around the world is going to be somewhat similar. I find it of concern – that is why I am working on it.

‘The biggest concern is we don’t really know much at all. I want to find out if it is safe or not.’

London came out as the most polluted city of the four tested, with a deposition rate 20 times higher than Dongguan. 

It is also three times worse than Hamburg in Germany and seven times worse than Paris.  

There is currently no suitable explanation for the varying numbers, with collection methods and limitations to current techniques and analysis restricting the study’s precision. 

The research, published in the journal Environment International, adds to a year’s worth of research revealing the scourge of microplastic pollution. 

Two separate pieces of research published in August brought the devastating problem to light.

Scientists are desperately trying to understand how bad the ubiquitous invisible particles are for human health. They stem from various sources and have spread around the world (pictured)

Scientists are desperately trying to understand how bad the ubiquitous invisible particles are for human health. They stem from various sources and have spread around the world (pictured)

A total of 15 different microplastics were identified in the study, The Guardian reports.  Tiny pieces of plastic - measuring between 0.02mm and 0.5mm in length - were captured on top of a nine-story building in London as well as at sites in Hamburg, Paris and Dongguan (file photo)

A total of 15 different microplastics were identified in the study, The Guardian reports.  Tiny pieces of plastic – measuring between 0.02mm and 0.5mm in length – were captured on top of a nine-story building in London as well as at sites in Hamburg, Paris and Dongguan (file photo)

One, from Germany’s Alfred Wegener Institute, found microplastics have drifted in the air as far as the Arctic and are settling in the pristine ice. 

Another, from the UN, investigated the potential health impacts of microplastics.

It found, in its landmark report, that found larger microplastic particles, bigger than 150 micrometres, are likely to be passed out of our bodies without harm.

Smaller particles could potentially be absorbed into our organs, however.

It also suggests microplastics have the potential to both carry disease-causing bacteria and help bacteria become resistant to antibiotics.

WHAT FURTHER RESEARCH IS NEEDED TO ASSESS THE SPREAD AND IMPACT OF MICROPLASTICS?

The World Health Organisation’s 2019 report ‘Microplastics in Drinking Water’ outlined numerous areas for future research that could shed light on how far spread the problem of microplastic pollution is, how it may impact human health and what can be done to stop these particles from entering our water supplies.

How widespread are microplastics?

The following research would clarify the occurrence of microplastics in drinking-water and freshwater sources:

  • More data are needed on the occurrence of microplastics in drinking-water to assess human exposure from drinking-water adequately. 
  • Studies on occurrence of microplastics must use quality-assured methods to determine numbers, shapes, sizes, and composition of the particles found. They should identify whether the microplastics are coming from the freshwater environment or from the abstraction, treatment, distribution or bottling of drinking-water. Initially, this research should focus on drinking-water thought to be most at risk of particulate contamination. 
  • Drinking-water studies would be usefully supplemented by better data on fresh water that enable the freshwater inputs to be quantified and the major sources identified. This may require the development of reliable methods to track origins and identify sources. 
  • A set of standard methods is needed for sampling and analysing microplastics in drinking-water and fresh water. 
  • There is a significant knowledge gap in the understanding of nanoplastics in the aquatic environment. A first step to address this gap is to develop standard methods for sampling and analysing nanoplastics. 

What are the health implications of microplastics?

Although water treatment can be effective in removing particles, there is limited data specific to microplastics. To support human health risk assessment and management options, the following data gaps related to water treatment need to be addressed: 

  • More research is needed to understand the fate of microplastics across different wastewater and drinking-water treatment processes (such as clarification processes and oxidation) under different operational circumstances, including optimal and sub-optimal operation and the influence of particle size, shape and chemical composition on removal efficacy. 
  • There is a need to better understand particle composition pre- and post-water treatment, including in distribution systems. The role of microplastic breakdown and abrasion in water treatment systems, as well as the microplastic contribution from the processes themselves should be considered. 
  • More knowledge is needed to understand the presence and removal of nanoplastic particles in water and wastewater treatment processes once standard methods for nanoplastics are available. 
  • There is a need to better understand the relationships between turbidity (and particle counts) and microplastic concentrations throughout the treatment processes. 
  • Research is needed to understand the significance of the potential return of microplastics to the environment from sludge and other treatment waste streams. 

To better understand microplastic-associated biofilms and their significance, the following research could be carried out:

  • Further studies could be conducted on the factors that influence the composition and potential specificity of microplastic-associated biofilms. 
  • Studies could also consider the factors influencing biofilm formation on plastic surfaces, including microplastics, and how these factors vary for different plastic materials, and what organisms more commonly bind to plastic surfaces in freshwater systems. 
  • Research could be carried out to better understand the capacity of microplastics to transport pathogenic bacteria longer distances downstream, the rate of degradation in freshwater systems and the relative abundance and transport capacity of microplastics compared with other particles.
  • Research could consider the risk of horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes in plastisphere microorganisms compared to other biofilms, such as those found in WWTPs. 

Can water treatment stop microplastics entering our water supplies?

Although water treatment can be effective in removing particles, there is limited data specific to microplastics. To support human health risk assessment and management options, the following data gaps related to water treatment need to be addressed: 

  • More research is needed to understand the fate of microplastics across different wastewater and drinking-water treatment processes (such as clarification processes and oxidation) under different operational circumstances, including optimal and sub-optimal operation and the influence of particle size, shape and chemical composition on removal efficacy. 
  • There is a need to better understand particle composition pre- and post-water treatment, including in distribution systems. The role of microplastic breakdown and abrasion in water treatment systems, as well as the microplastic contribution from the processes themselves should be considered.
  • More knowledge is needed to understand the presence and removal of nanoplastic particles in water and wastewater treatment processes once standard methods for nanoplastics are available. 
  • There is a need to better understand the relationships between turbidity (and particle counts) and microplastic concentrations throughout the treatment processes. 
  • Research is needed to understand the significance of the potential return of microplastics to the environment from sludge and other treatment waste streams.





READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.