Fashion

Government rejects MPs’ sustainable fashion recommendations


The government has rejected all recommendations made by the
Environmental Audit Committee’s ‘Fixing Fashion Report: Clothing
Consumption and Sustainability’ report published in February.

The report called on the government to “end the era of throwaway
fashion” through multiple recommendations covering environmental and labour
market practices, including introducing a one penny charge on each item of
clothing to pay for better clothing collection and recycling, as well as a
ban on incinerating or landfilling unsold stock, and mandatory
environmental targets for fashion retailers with a turnover above 36
million pounds. All of which the government has rejected.

Environmental audit committee chair Mary Creagh MP said in a statement:
“Fashion producers should be forced to clear up the mountains of waste they
create. The Government has rejected our call, demonstrating that it is
content to tolerate practices that trash the environment and exploit
workers despite having just committed to net zero emission targets.

“The Government is out of step with the public who are shocked by the
fact that we are sending 300,000 tonnes of clothes a year to incineration
or landfill. Ministers have failed to recognise that urgent action must be
taken to change the fast fashion business model which produces cheap
clothes that cost the earth.”

On workers’ rights Creagh added: “We presented the Government with the
evidence that it has failed to stop garment workers in this country being
criminally underpaid, despite its claim that the number of national minimum
wage inspectors has increased.

“The public has a right to know that the clothes they buy are not
produced by children or forced labour, however, the Government hasn’t
accepted our recommendations on the Modern Slavery Act to force fashion
retailers to increase transparency in their supply chains.

“This is plain wrong. The Environmental Audit Committee will be closely
monitoring steps that the Government claims it is taking to address the
problems exposed in our report.”

Government rejects recommendations to force fashion industry to clean
up its act

On adding a new Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme to reduce
textile waste with a one penny charge per garment on producers, the
government said it would “consider” the report’s recommendations, however,
added no details on when the scheme would be introduced, stating that a
consultation could run as late as 2025.

With regards to imposing a ban on incinerating or landfilling unsold
stock that can be reused or recycled, the government rejected the
recommendations and said that it “considers positive approaches are
required to find outlets for waste textiles rather than simply imposing a
landfill ban”.

The government also didn’t accept the concept of adding mandatory
environmental targets for fashion retailers with a turnover above 36
million pounds, instead it stated that environmental savings are made by a
voluntary industry-led programme, which the Environmental Audit Committee
adds “fails to address evidence from WRAP (Waste and Resources Action
Programme) that the impact of increased volumes of clothing being sold
outweighs efficiency savings made on carbon and water”.

When challenged that the fashion industry must come together to set out
their blueprint for a net zero-emissions world, reducing their carbon
consumption back to 1990 levels, the government said it rejected this, and
pointed to support for the voluntary Sustainable Clothing Action Plan
(SCAP), coordinated by WRAP with the industry working towards targets to
reduce carbon emissions, water and waste.

The government’s response to recommendations that the scheme should
reward fashion companies that design products with lower environmental
impacts and penalise those that do not, was that it was instead focusing on
single-use plastic in packaging, not clothing.
While suggestions that the government should follow Sweden’s lead and
reduce VAT on repair services, it added that there was “little evidence a
VAT reduction has been effective in Sweden or that savings have been passed
on to consumers”.

Image: courtesy of Stella McCartney – where the British designer
highlighted how “disposable” items are harmful to the environment in her
AW17 advertising campaign



READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.