Alexander the Great DIED before Alexandria was founded: Historian claims that a former ally used the ruler’s legacy to establish his own leadership and build the ancient city
- His successor used the leader’s legacy to cement his own rule of Alexandria
- The Ptolemies actually founded Alexandria made it into the great city it became
- But he reportedly ‘diverted’ the leader’s body from Babylon by using a dummy
- Ptolemy I paraded Alexander the Great’s corpse in the city long after his death
The legend of Alexander the Great may have to be rewritten after controversial claims by a historian who says the leader died before the founding of his city.
The little port of Alexandria which became a major centre of the ancient world was just an ‘outpost’ for the leader who never had greater ambitions for it, he claims.
Alexander the Great died before the city was officially founded, and the association was made to legitimise the rule of Ptolemy I, who then became King, it is said.
Alexander III, commonly known as Alexander the Great, was a king of Macedon, a state in northern ancient Greece. By the age of thirty, he had created one of the largest empires of the ancient world, stretching from the Ionian Sea to the Himalayas.
In a paper named Alexander in Africa, Professor Philip Bosman describes the claims that the city was founded by Alexander the Great as being made for ‘propaganda’ by the man who declared himself king.
Professor Bosman writes: ‘The port was not the embodiment of ambitions that Alexander himself harboured.
‘It was deliberately orchestrated among the early members of the Ptolemaic dynasty, who wished to feed off the glamour of its founder in their own power game.’
In the years following Alexander’s death, a series of civil wars tore his empire apart, resulting in several states ruled by Alexander’s surviving generals and heirs holding onto a sense of unity was an important strategy adopted by his successors.
He added: ‘The purposes of which are to establish or symbolise social cohesion, to legitimise institutions and power relations, and to influence beliefs, values and behaviour. ‘
‘Alexander was a conqueror who established outposts along the way, and Alexandria in all probability started humbly as a military fort.
‘Alexander’s successors, on the other hand, were interested in cities to rule.
‘Alexandria came to play that part late in the reign of Ptolemy I Soter, when he made it the capital of his kingdom.’
The city of Alexandria in Egypt may have merely been one of the ‘outposts’ that Alexander the Great adopted during his time as leader and that it only became prominent after his successor, Ptolemy I, built it on the legend that Alexander had great ambitions for the little port
Timothy Howe, author of Founding Alexandria, who is making the claims against Ptolemy, writes in the same paper: ‘Ptolemy chose Egypt because he realised that Alexandria, Alexander the Great’s prestigious city foundation, enabled him to obtain immediately the prestige linked with the recollection of the conqueror.
‘Ongoing archaeological excavations of the area have so far failed to yield conclusive evidence for Alexander’s personal involvement in Alexandria; indeed, all analyses of the physical evidence suggest that Ptolemies I and II were responsible for Alexandria’s planning and growth as a city’.
The author also mentions that the city did not gain any notoriety until the Ptolemies built the harbour’s famous lighthouse and the Great museum and library of Alexandria.
Only five barely intact accounts of his death at Babylon in 323 BCE survive to the present day and all conflict to varying degrees.
According to one account from the Roman era, Alexander died leaving his kingdom ‘to the strongest’ or ‘most worthy’ of his generals.
Ptlomey may also have stolen Alexander’s body from Babylon, where it initially was embalmed, by using a dummy corpse, one of the text says.
One author describes how Ptlomey may also have wrestled Alexander’s body from Babylon and paraded the corpse in the city two years after his death.
According to the latest historical paper, Ptolemy ‘seriously misrepresent’ Alexandria’s origins in order to ‘magnify the importance for Alexander and, more to the point, himself.’